treelogo.JPG (5072 bytes)

Reporter

ARTICLES  
     
  South Florida Water Management District v. Miccosukee - Friends of the Everglades Perspective
John Childe

      


     The Everglades was once a “River of Grass”, As Marjory Stoneman Douglas, founder of the Friends of the Everglades called it. It flowed unimpeded from Lake Okeechobee to the Florida Bay during the rainy seasons. For the past century men have tried to tame the Everglades by constructing canals to drain the land, and eventually constructing berms around the lake and much of the Everglades. Their efforts have ultimately succeeded. Now, the Everglades has been broken up into five major areas, the Park, three areas north of the Park, named Water Conservation Areas by the Water Management District, and the Everglades Agricultural Area, sever hundred thousand acres of sugar cane farms, that lies between the Lake and the rest of the Everglades.

     This “restoration” of the Everglades, as the Water Management District describes the draining of the Everglades in their Brief to the Supreme Court, has caused the rapid deterioration of the Everglades, evidenced by the growth of tens of thousands of acres of cat tails and other invasive species, and the loss of more than ninety percent of the bird life in the Everglades.

     When Castro took over Cuba it became the policy of the U.S. to grow its own sugar, and not be dependent on Cuban sugar. As a result Congress passed an embargo of foreign sugar and created subsidies for sugar grown here. This made sugar cane growing in the Everglades feasible on a large scale; but it has also depressed sugar farming in other countries, including Mexico, Puerto Rico, Nicaragua, and else where.

     It was the expansion of sugar production in the Everglades as well as new practices of the Corps of Engineers and the Water Management District to drain urban areas and discharge their water into the Everglades that has caused the Everglades to decline so rapidly.

     The S-9 pump station drains the lands in Broward County that have recently been subject to one major housing development after another. When the Everglades was natural the excess water drained to the east, into the ocean. The development in the area, including roads, houses and other urban development, has created too much water that is now flowing into storm water drains rather than being stored in the ground, and there are not enough ways to take the water east to the ocean. The solution of the Water Management District is to simply dump the urban water into the Everglades by pumping west.

     This discharge of water contains many pollutants, and has resulted in the thousands of acres of the Everglades on the eastern side, to be turned into cattails. That is why the Friends of the Everglades and the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians have brought the suit against the Water Management District.

     The Friends and the Tribe want the District to clean up the water before discharging into the Everglades, or to find ways to retain the water, in newly created lakes or ponds where the water could serve positive purposes. Both solutions are possible.

     The lawsuit is based on the terms and conditions of the Clean Water Act. This Act was passed by Congress in 1972, after an entire river flowing through Cleveland into Lake Erie caught fire from the pollution in the river. The Act was specifically intended to take over water quality restoration from the States, who were simply not willing to make the hard decisions to clean up the water under prior legislation. That is exactly the problem in the Everglades Restoration. The Water Management District is not willing to tell the sub-districts, where the urban development is occurring in Broward County, to build the water storage areas and clean the water up before they send it to the District’s C-11 canal. Nor is the State of Florida, the governor, the DEP, willing to take on “Big Sugar” and Urban Development, and make them be responsible for their pollution.

     The Water Management District does not like the Clean Water Act because it requires them to meet all State Water Quality Standards, and to meet them at the point of discharge, and to be in compliance each day. Both the District and the DEP want to deal with only one pollutant, phosphorous, and to look for compliance in the center of the Everglades, and to be able to average a non complying discharge with one that is in compliance, and to measure compliance on a rolling annual average, rather than each day.

     To justify their position the Water Management District has described the entire Everglades natural system as their water management system. The District wants to be able to move water wherever it wants to, whenever it wants to, and at the quality level it wants to, without being required to meet the standards of the Federal Clean Water Act.

     The District argues that it does not create the pollutants, so it is not responsible. But the District did create the canal and the pump station specifically to allow the sources of pollution to drain into, and then to discharge into the Everglades. The Clean Water act does not look to who created the pollutants, but who is discharging them into the Nation’s waters.

     The District claims that it will be too expensive to treat the water, and to meet the conditions of the Clean Water Act. But the District fails to see how much harm it is causing and how that will impact the entire South Florida economy if the Everglades is destroyed because it is a dumping ground for Big Sugar and Urban Development.