During the
December 2005 Special Session, the Florida
Legislature enacted new requirements for all
lobbyists and lobbying firms and their principals –
including some that could well affect environmental
and land use lawyers. The measure became effective
on January 1, 2005.[1]
The new law received
considerable attention in the popular press because
it generally bans gifts or other expenditures to
legislators and many other government employees by
any lobbyist or principal. However, the new law
includes a number of disclosure and reporting
requirements. Most significantly, the new law
requires lobbying firms to periodically disclose the
compensation paid by the principal to the lobbying
firm for lobbying.
Here is a brief summary
of some of the key provisions:
Registration:
The new law does not make any major change in who
must register before lobbying the legislative or
executive branch.[2]
Generally speaking, you must first register with the
legislative branch if you receive compensation for
influencing or attempting to influence legislative
action or inaction through oral or written
communications or for attempting to obtain the
goodwill of a member or employee of the Legislature.
Likewise, you must first register with the
Commission on Ethics if you receive compensation for
seeking – on behalf of another person – to influence
an agency decision in the area of policy or
procurement or for attempting to obtain the goodwill
of an agency official.[3]
The new law adds two
provisions that affect registration. First, each
principal must now identify its "main business."
This is to be done by use of the North American
Industry Classification System (NAICS), a six-digit
numerical code. Second, the new law prohibits the
registration of a person convicted of a felony after
January 1, 2006.
Compensation Reporting. For the first time,
lobbying firms are required to report compensation
received for lobbying. This applies to those
lobbying the executive branch, as well as to those
who lobby the Legislature. Each firm is required to
file a compensation report for each quarter. The
reports must disclose the amount of compensation
provided or to be provided by each principal and the
total by all principals. The reports are due 45
days after the end of each quarter. The first
reports are due May 15, 2006.
Recordkeeping/Audits.
The new law also requires lobbying firms to
maintain all records, papers and other documents to
substantiate the compensation paid for lobbying.
These documents may be subpoenaed for audit by
either house of the Legislature or the Commission on
Ethics, and the subpoena may be enforced in circuit
court. In addition, the new law provides for audits
of three percent (3%) of lobbying firms by
independent auditors to determine compliance with
the new compensation disclosure requirement.
Ethical Implications
of Disclosure Requirements. The new reporting
provisions require those lobbyists who are lawyers
to disclose confidential information about the
client which implicates the Rules of Professional
Conduct. The Florida Bar has provided guidance on
these matters.[4]
Among other things, the Bar notes that lawyers who
are lobbyists must obtain the consent of each client
for whom the lawyer provides lobbying services in
order to comply with the statute's disclosure
requirements. The Bar also recommends that lawyers
consider segregating the information that relates to
lobbying activities from all other representation of
the client. In addition, the Bar suggests that the
lawyer disclose information to an auditor only in
response to a subpoena and that the lawyer seek a
judicial determination before disclosing any
information the lawyer believes is privileged.
Ban on
Expenditures. The new law prohibits any
expenditure by a lobbyist or principal to any
employee or member of the Legislature (except floral
arrangements displayed in the chamber on opening day
of the regular session). It also prohibits any
expenditure by a lobbyist to agency officials,
members and employees of certain executive branch
agencies.[5]
The term "expenditure" is defined broadly to include
a payment, distribution, loan, reimbursement,
deposit or anything of value made by a lobbyist or
principal for the purpose of "lobbying."
Unanswered Questions. The new law was
adopted somewhat hastily during a special
legislative session that was called to deal with
other issues. As such, it is no surprise that there
appear to be a number of as yet unanswered
questions.
One of the principal
questions concerns whether the lobbying firm is
required to report only that compensation received
for those activities that fall within the definition
of "lobbying" or, whether the firm also must report
all compensation paid by the principal to the firm
that is in any way related to or supportive of the
firm's lobbying on behalf of the principal. For
example, consider a lawyer who represents a
principal for compensation seeking to influence a
pending DEP rulemaking. The lawyer is not required
to register to appear at a public workshop or public
hearing.[6]
However, the effective lawyer often submits written
comments or meets with key agency officials outside
of these public proceedings, and registration is
required for these latter activities. When the
lawyer's firm files its quarterly compensation
report, does the firm disclose only the compensation
paid by the principal for those activities that
constitute "lobbying" (i.e., those activities
outside of the public workshop or public hearing)
or, must the firm disclose all compensation received
for all of activities in any way related to or
supporting the efforts to influence the rulemaking
(including appearances at a public workshop or
hearing)?
Guidance. As of
this writing, the only guidance that the Legislature
has provided for those who lobby the Legislative
branch, are interim guidelines that deal primarily
with the ban on expenditures.[7]
The Florida Commission on Ethics has published
emergency rules to implement the provisions that
concern lobbyists who lobby executive branch
agencies.[8]
The Commission also has announced that it will be
amending its current rules, Chapters 34-7 and 34-12,
Florida Administrative Code, to conform to the new
law.[9]
Legal
Challenge. The new law is the subject of a legal
challenge filed on February 16, 2006. The
plaintiffs allege that the new law is invalid and
should be stricken because it: (1) was not validly
enacted; (2) invades the exclusive jurisdiction of
the Florida Supreme Court to regulate lawyers,
violates the right to freedom of speech and
association, to petition government and to equal
protection by prohibiting expenditures for lobbying,
and by prohibiting contributions to candidates and
committees; (3) violates the right to freedom of
speech and association, to petition government and
to equal protection by imposing vague or
standardless regulations, and by imposing special
burdens on lobbyists; (4) violates the right of
privacy by compelling disclosure of private
information; (5) violates the right to due process
and jury trial; and (6) violates the separation of
powers doctrine. Florida Association of
Professional Lobbyists, Inc., et al. v. Division of
Legislative Information Services of the Florida
Office of Legislative Services, et al., Case No.
2006 CA 488 (2d Cir.).
Stay tuned.
________________________
Lawrence E.
Sellers, Jr., larry.sellers@hklaw.com,
received his J.D. from the University of Florida
College of Law in 1979. He is a partner in the
Tallahassee office of Holland + Knight LLP.
[3] The Commission on
Ethics has adopted implementing rules in
Chapter 34-12, Fla. Admin. Code.
[4] See Questions and
Answers on Ethical Implications of the New
Lobbyist Disclosure Statute, available
online.
[5] An agency official or
employee is an individual who is required to
file full or limited disclosure of his or
her financial interests.
[6] See Rule 34-12.170(7).
[7] See Interim Guidelines
on Lobbyists Expenditure (Jan. 20, 2006.)
[9] The Commission was
expected to publish proposed rule amendments
on March 24 and to adopt them at its meeting
on April 21.