INTRODUCTION
The major issues of the 1998 legislative
session were tort reform, education spending, and children's programs. No new
environmental programs were created and few changes were made to existing environmental
regulations. The major environmental/growth management initiatives of the 1998 session all
involved economics. For example, the growth management package of the Department of
Community Affairs was made a part of the school concurrency legislation which is naturally
driven by economics. This theme of economics can be found in the Everglades restudy
legislation; the environmental mitigation legislation for the Department of Transportation
which included a per ton fee on rock mining activities in the East Everglades; direction
regarding condemnation of lands in the Kissimmee River Basin; a prohibition against the
use of federal condemnation procedures; and forgiveness for the Department of
Environmental Protection relative to loans which that department received for hydrilo
removal and the start-up of the NPDES program. The economic theme is also at the heart of
the Legislature's inability to enact a revised land acquisition program.
In a year with a $46 billion budget, a
line-item veto of over $96 million worth of member projects and a $50 tax rebate coupled
with tax free shopping days, it is not surprising that economics pervaded the
environmental and land use areas. The brownfields and drycleaning legislation contain
loans, redevelopment incentives, and numerous economically driven revisions to the
programs' eligibility. The overall Everglades issues, reflected in HBs 4141 and 4071,
focus on restoration costs. The Legislature wants to be a participant in those decisions,
and they expressed a concern that the land owners involved in this massive public works
project receive a fair market value for their property. Probably the most representative
piece of environmental legislation that sums up this Legislature's emphasis on financial
issues was the $12 million expansion of the tax exemption for pollution control equipment.
The Republican controlled 1998 Legislature proved itself to be bottom-line oriented.
However, no measures were passed that would lower the bar or turn back the clock on
environmental protection.
Following is a summary of the more significant
environmental/land use bills that passed this Session. The bills are listed in numeric
order under each general category.
I. ENVIRONMENTAL/REGULATORY
Drycleaning Contamination Remediation Program
CS/SB
244
CS/SB 244 enacts several changes to the 1994
law which established the drycleaning contamination remediation program. This bill impacts
present and former owners and operators of drycleaning facilities or wholesale supply
facilities at which there is drycleaning solvent contamination, as well as nearby
landowners.
CS/SB 244 provides tax credits of up to 35% of
the cost of integral voluntary cleanup activities for drycleaning solvent contaminated
sites and brownfield sites. Single-site voluntary cleanups may not receive more than
$250,000 per year in tax credits. Total tax credits authorized in a single year are
limited to $2,000,000. These tax credits may be transferred after a merger or acquisition
to the surviving or acquiring entity and used in the same manner with the same
limitations.
DEP will determine whether a drycleaning
facility or wholesale supply facility is eligible for the remediation program. Facilities
operated in a grossly negligent manner will be ineligible for the program. The deadline
for applying for eligibility for the program is changed from December 31, 2005 to December
31, 1998. In an effort to encourage complete remediation of contaminated sites, a taxpayer
voluntarily cleaning up a contaminated site may claim an additional 10% of the total
cleanup cost (up to $50,000) in the final year of the site cleanup, as demonstrated by the
issuance of a DEP "No Further Action" order for that site. The bill provides
that a person who conducts voluntary site rehabilitation shall be not compelled to perform
a site cleanup under some circumstances. This immunity shall continue to apply to any real
property owner who transfers, conveys or leases the property, so long as the voluntary
cleanup activities continue.
Also, if an owner's property becomes
contaminated by the operation of a nearby drycleaning or wholesale supply facility due to
geophysical or hydrologic forces, they are exempt from liability under certain
circumstances. Finally, DEP is directed to adopt rules to prescribe the tasks that
comprise a site rehabilitation program and the level at which a rehabilitation program
task and a site rehabilitation program may be deemed complete, as well as rules
incorporating risk-based corrective action principles to protect human health and safety
and the environment in a cost-effective manner. DEP may also adopt rules to provide
guidelines and procedures to facilitate tax credit claims for voluntary cleanup
activities. These rules must include protocols for the use of natural attenuation and the
issuance of "No Further Action" letters.
Accidental Release Prevention
CS/SB
812 and CS/SB
814
CS/SB 812 creates the Accidental Release
Prevention and Risk Management Planning Program and authorizes the Department of Community
Affairs (DCA) to seek delegation from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for
the Accidental Release Prevention Program established under Section 112(r) of the federal
Clean Air Act. The bill defines those facilities which may be regulated under this new
program, and creates an exemption for sources subject to Chapter 527, F.S., whose only
regulated substance subject to the program is liquified petroleum gas. Those stationary
sources exempted from DCA's authority will be subject to the Accidental Release Prevention
Program administered by EPA. DCA is granted rulemaking authority and is required to
establish an outreach program. Other local and state agencies which are affected by this
program are directed to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with DCA.
The bill provides the DCA with enforcement
authority and penalties for violations and also authorizes the DCA to establish program
fees for affected stationary sources. The fee schedule establishes the following maximum
annual registration fees: Program 1 stationary sources - $100, with a multi-source
exemption for facilities under common ownership and which are subject to regulation based
on the same single chemical process; Program 2 stationary sources - $200, also with a
multi-source discount, and a separate fee maximum of $100 for agriculture Standard
Industrial Classification group numbers 01, 02, or 07; and Program 3 stationary sources -
$1,000. A late fee may be assessed for failure to timely submit a registration fee.
DCA is required to periodically audit risk
management plans submitted by owners and operators subject to the program to ascertain and
ensure compliance with the program. DCA is also required to develop an annual audit work
plan which identifies stationary sources for audits. A "soft sun-down" provision
requires the Legislature to review the implementation and effectiveness of the program
during the 2000 legislative session and enact any legislation necessary to implement
suggested changes.
Environmental Equity and Justice
CS/HB
945
In a continuing effort to address perceived
inequities in the application of environmental laws/regulations and the impacts of
pollution, the Legislature created the Center for Environmental Equity and Justice (CEEJ)
to be housed at the Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University (FAMU) Environmental
Sciences Institute. The Center shall conduct and facilitate research, develop policies,
and engage in education, training, and community outreach with respect to environmental
equity and justice issues. The bill also creates the Community Environmental Health
Program (CEHP) and Community Environmental Health Advisory Board to identify community
environmental health needs and types of health services beyond those presently provided to
address health effects associated with exposure to environmental contamination. The
recommendations of the CEEJ and CEHP should assist state policymakers in developing sound
and workable environmental equity and justice policies.
Ash Residue Reuse and Recycling
SB
1058
SB 1058 authorizes DEP to approve the
recycling or reuse of ash residue generated by a solid waste management facility where an
applicant can demonstrate that no significant threat to public health will result and that
applicable DEP standards and criteria will not be violated. The bill also authorizes DEP
to adopt rules, if necessary, for administering these provisions. DEP is not required,
however, to amend its existing rules concerning ash residue reuse and recycling.
Analytical Quality Assurance
SB
1334
SB 1334 provides authority for existing DEP
rules which contain quality assurance requirements for environmental data that is
submitted to DEP. Public or private parties, such as environmental laboratories or
sampling firms, collect data samples for various DEP activities. The environmental data
must meet qualitative and quantitative requirements to be acceptable for use in a specific
program. The rule requirements pertain to the quality of data in terms of precision,
accuracy, completeness, representativeness and comparability, as well as non-measurable
qualifiers such as legally defensible data.
Asbestos Fees
SB
1336
Another rule authority bill, SB 1336
authorizes DEP's asbestos fee rule found at Chapter 62-257, F.A.C. That rule provides
notification and associated fee requirements for DEP's asbestos removal regulatory program
as prescribed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's National Emission Standards
for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for asbestos.
Motor Vehicle Inspection Program
CS/HB
1377
The Department of Highway Safety and Motor
Vehicles (DHSMV) must hire an independent expert consultant to develop appropriate
Request-For-Proposal (RFP) specifications to study the effectiveness of the current MVIP
and also the impending federal ozone standards. The consultant must submit its report by
January 1, 1999, and shall consider both annual and biennial testing; exempting the three
most recent model years of cars from testing; and basic testing for hydrocarbon and carbon
monoxide emissions, and other mobile source testing for nitrous oxides. $125,000 is
appropriated to fund this study. The DHSMV is prohibited from extending the current
contracts or from entering into new contracts absent specific legislative authorization to
do so. However, if the Legislature does not pass MVIP legislation during the 1999 session,
then the DHSMV may enter into contracts for a biennial inspection program using the basic
test which exempts the most recent 4 model years of cars from testing. Any such contracts
cannot exceed 2 years in duration.
Telecommunications Rights-of-Way
CS/CS/SB
1704
Local governments have increasingly required
payment of fees and in-kind contributions from telecommunications companies in order to
permit them to place their lines within public rights-of-way. CS/CS/SB 1704 should reduce
the fees paid by telecommunications companies for the location of lines within public road
rights-of-way. In this regard, fees charged by local governments to telecommunications
companies for the use of public rights-of-way cannot exceed 1% of the company's gross
revenues generated within that local government's corporate boundaries. Importantly, any
"in-kind" contributions required by the local government are applied to that 1%
fee. The bill provides that the local government may charge a minimum of $500 per linear
mile for a telecommunications service to occupy a public right-of-way. Any charge in
excess of $500 per linear mile must be based on the direct cost of using the right-of-way
and a reasonable cost for administering the municipal regulation.
Two grandfathering provisions are also
included in the bill. One allows telecommunications companies that are lawfully occupying
a municipal right-of-way to continue that use without receiving additional approvals. The
municipality may, however, impose fees and adopt rules and regulations governing the use
of the right-of-way by these grandfathered facilities. Existing ordinances and agreements
which require "in-kind" contributions from telecommunications companies are also
specifically grandfathered.
Finally, the bill clarifies that a local
government may not exert any control over telecommunications companies regarding matters
which are within the jurisdiction of the Public Service Commission or the Federal
Communications Commission. Local governments may need to enact ordinances or regulations
to comply with the provisions of the bill.
Department of Health
CS/SB
1716
CS/SB 1716 provides authority for, or
incorporates into statute, existing Department of Health (DOH) rules which relate to:
The environmental health functions administered by DOH. The bill
adds a sanitary facilities function which includes minimum standards for sanitary
facilities for places serving the public, places of employment, special and temporary
events, and homeless shelters.
Supervision of private and certain public water systems. The
bill requires water suppliers to give public notice of water problems and corrective
measures.
Regulation of on-site sewage treatment and disposal systems
(OSDS). The bill authorizes DOH to regulate OSDS which receive 5,000 gallons or less per
day of commercial sewage flow; specifies the rules DOH may adopt regarding portable and
temporary toilet services and holding tanks; authorizes operating permits and annual
inspections for aerobic treatment units and facilities which generate commercial waste;
requires local governments to issue building or plumbing permits for buildings using OSDS
only after DOH has issued an OSDS permit; prohibits building occupancy before DOH has
approved OSDS installation; and prohibits change of occupancy until DOH has determined
suitability of change for OSDS use.
Regulation and certification of environmental and public water
supply laboratories, radon testing and testing equipment, and septic tank contractors.
Sewage Treatment Loans/Solid Waste Disposal
HB
3125
This bill provides additional legislative
authority to perpetuate the revolving loan program for local government sewage treatment
facilities. It also clarifies an "on-site disposal" solid waste permit exemption
and amends financial assurance requirements applicable to privately-owned solid waste
management facilities. DEP is granted authorization to administer the existing Sewage
Treatment Revolving Loan Fund so as to maximize proceeds available to local government
agencies for planning, designing, and constructing sewage treatment facilities.
The legislation clarifies the solid waste
permit exemption for persons disposing of solid waste resulting from their own activities
on their own property to include "ordinary household waste." It further
clarifies that other materials which could create a public nuisance or adversely affect
the environment or public health (e.g., batteries, solvents, hazardous substances, etc.)
are not covered under the permit exemption. Where both DEP and a local government
independently require financial assurance for closure of a privately-owned solid waste
management facility, the bill requires increased inter-agency coordination to ensure that
duplicative financial requirements are not imposed on the owner or operator. The bill
facilitates use of a single financial mechanism to cover the required costs.
DEP is expected to incorporate the solid waste
disposal permit and financial assurance revisions into Chapter 62-701, F.A.C.
Pollution Control Equipment Tax Exemption
CS/CS/HB
3229
Acting on the economic theme of the 1998
session, the legislature enacted a sales tax exemption for any facility, device, fixture,
equipment or machinery used primarily for the control or abatement of pollution or
contaminants in manufacturing, processing, compounding, or producing for sale items of
tangible personal property at a fixed location. To qualify, such facility, device,
fixture, equipment or structure must be installed or constructed to meet a law implemented
by, or a permit condition of, DEP. The bill also specifically creates a sales tax
exemption for equipment, machinery or materials required to meet any law implemented by,
or permit condition of, DEP that are purchased for the monitoring, prevention, abatement,
or control of pollution or contaminants at privately owned or operated landfills or
construction and demolition debris disposal facilities.
Boating Safety
CS/CS/HB
3265
CS/CS/HB 3265 conforms the penalty provisions
for "boating under the influence" to the penalties imposed under Florida law for
driving under the influence. Specifically, this bill reinstates the $500 civil penalty,
which had been inadvertently repealed in 1996, for boaters who refuse to submit to any
lawful breath, blood or urine test for alcohol or chemical substances. The operation of
vessels by persons under the age of 21 who have a breath-alcohol level of 0.02% or
higher is prohibited. Penalties for a violation include a minimum of 50 hours of public
service, suspension of the vessel operating privilege until such service is performed, and
the successful completion of a boating safety course. The bill also increases from 1 to 2
the number of noncriminal infractions that must be committed within a 12-month period
before mandatory boating education will be required.
Hazardous Waste Facility Siting
CS/HB
3701
Initially drafted to target a specific
facility in Duval County, this legislation has statewide effect by restricting the
location of facilities which specifically "manage" (i.e., treat, store, dispose
of, or transfer) hazardous waste that is not generated at the regulated facility. The bill
also applies to all federal facilities that manage hazardous waste.
DEP is prohibited from issuing a permit for
the construction, initial operation, or substantial modification of hazardous waste
management facilities at certain locations. Those locations include areas where
life-threatening concentrations of hazardous substances could accumulate under certain
specified circumstances; within 1,500 yards of hospitals, schools, or similar identified
sites; and within 1,000 yards of any residence. The key phrases "substantial
modification," "initial operation," and "life-threatening
concentrations of hazardous substances" are defined.
The permit and siting prohibitions do not
apply to permitted hazardous waste manufacturers, power generators, or other industrial
operations where hazardous wastes were generated on-site or from other sites owned
or acquired by the permittee. Similarly, the bill does not apply to the operation of
existing hazardous waste transfer facilities which are not relocated or which do not
undergo a substantial modification to the facility's structure or operation.
DEP, charged with administering the state's
hazardous waste regulatory program, must develop amendments to Chapter 62-730, F.A.C., to
implement the facility location restrictions and permit requirements specified in CS/HB
3701.
II. WATER RESOURCES
Local Sources First
CS/SBs
312 & 2298
CS/SBs 312 & 2298 addresses the allocation
of water resources throughout Florida and imposes a "local sources first"
directive. Under this directive, DEP and the water management districts are directed to
encourage the use of water from sources nearest the area of use or application whenever
practicable. Such sources include all naturally occurring water sources and all
alternative water sources including, but not limited to, desalination, conservation, reuse
of non-potable reclaimed water and stormwater, and aquifer storage and recovery. The
"local sources first" directive does not apply to the transport and use of water
within the Central and Southern Florida Flood Control Project nor to the transport and use
of water for bottled water. The transport and use of reclaimed water for electrical power
production by an electric utility is also exempt from the "local sources first"
directive.
The bill specifies the factors to be
considered when evaluating whether a potential transport and use of ground or surface
water across county boundaries is consistent with the public interest. The reuse of
potable reclaimed water and stormwater are not subject to this evaluation. Where
district-wide water supply assessments and regional water supply plans have been prepared,
they will be used as the basis for consideration of the public interest factors.
Applicants must include information pertaining to the specified public interest factors in
permit applications for the transport and use of water.
Regional water supply authorities that exist
under a voluntary interlocal agreement and receive or maintain consumptive use permits
under that agreement are exempt from the public interest factors and the additional permit
application information requirements. This exemption only applies to water sources within
the jurisdictional areas of the interlocal agreements.
Stormwater Runoff
CS/SB
846
This bill authorizes the Department of
Transportation (DOT) to regulate storm water runoff on the state's right-of-ways resulting
from man-made changes to adjacent properties. Language is added which clarifies that
property owners, who are issued DOT permits, are not exempt from applicable federal,
state, local or regional regulations governing pollution control, water quality, surface
water management or land use. The bill requires that permittees reimburse the DOT for
expenses incurred by the DOT resulting from the permittee's unpermitted discharges to a
right-of-way. Finally, the bill expands the DOT's ability to revoke or suspend a permit
for rule violations relating to the permitting, construction, operation or maintenance of
a facility.
Water Utilities
CS/HB
1052
This bill establishes procedures for the
procurement of goods and services by the Public Service Commission (PSC). On the
environmental front, it requires water and wastewater utilities to own the land or possess
the right to continued use of land on which their treatment facilities are located. Also,
water and wastewater utilities must now notify the PSC and customers prior to a name
change.
Wastewater Treatment
SB
1436
This bill provides authority to DEP to
classify water and wastewater treatment plants based on plant size, complexity and water
treatment level. This bill further authorizes DEP to establish certification levels and
staffing requirements for water and wastewater operations as well as adopt as necessary
other water treatment facility rules.
West Coast Regional Water Supply Authority
CS/HB
4027
CS/HB 4027, which is referred to as the
West Coast Regional Water Supply Authority "governance" law, is intended to end
the water wars between Hillsborough, Pasco, and Pinellas Counties. Those counties, plus
the cities of Tampa, New Port Richey, and St. Petersburg, have vested extraordinary
authority in the West Coast Regional Water Supply Authority (WCRWSA). The legislation
results from a report submitted to the 1997 Legislature which recommended structural
changes in the operation of the WCRWSA so that it might serve as the exclusive wholesale
supplier of public water in the Tampa Bay region. In order to implement the provisions of
this legislation, all 6 members of the WCRWSA have executed an interlocal agreement
specifically detailing their duties and obligations. As a result of the legislation, the
WCRWSA will be the primary, if not exclusive, provider of approximately 300 million
gallons of water per day to the citizens of the Tampa Bay region.
In an effort to prevent continuing
administrative and judicial litigation involving water rights, member governments of the
WCRWSA have agreed to modify or waive administrative rights under Chapter 120, F.S., and
have agreed to participate and be bound by alternative dispute resolution processes. These
issues are more specifically outlined in the interlocal agreement executed by the parties.
The bill repeals all general and special laws affecting water in the WCRWSA. It also
authorizes the member governments to use their financing capability for water treatment
production and transmission facilities that might benefit the region. The powers which the
member governments have relinquished and vested in the WCRWSA are specifically detailed in
the interlocal agreement. The bill provides that the terms of the interlocal agreement
control the more general language contained in the statute.
The bill also contains provisions addressing
the Miami River Commission. The Commission is identified as a coordinating clearinghouse
relating to issues associated with the Miami River, and is authorized to seek and receive
funding regarding river improvement projects. Membership of the Miami River Commission is
specifically outlined. The power to limit commercial activity and to impose taxes, fees,
or other financial obligations is prohibited unless approved by unanimous vote of all
Commission members. The Commission will expire on July 1, 2003.
One of the major incentives for the newly
structured WCRWSA was the completion of a partnership agreement between the member
governments and the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD). This partnership
agreement is being finalized and will include a provision appropriating $183 million from
SWFWMD to be used by the WCRWSA to develop new water sources.
Restudy of the Central and Southern Florida Project
CS/CS/HB
4141
In 1992, Congress authorized the Restudy of
the Central and Southern Florida Project (Restudy). The purpose of the Restudy is to
develop modifications to the Central and Southern Florida Project to restore the
Everglades and Florida Bay ecosystems while providing for other water-related needs of the
region. CS/CS/HB 4141 authorizes the South Florida Water Management District (District) to
participate as local sponsor for the Restudy.
The Joint Legislative Committee on Everglades
Oversight (Joint Committee) is given the responsibility of monitoring all funding and
expenditures for projects or operational changes resulting from the Restudy. The Joint
Committee will review all alternatives evaluated by the Restudy as an interim project,
hold at least two public hearings on the comprehensive plan proposed for the project area,
and provide written comments to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the District during
the public comment period for the proposed comprehensive plan. In its written comments,
the Joint Committee must address the extent to which the proposed comprehensive plan is
consistent with the goals and objectives of Chapter 373, F.S., and the extent to which the
proposed comprehensive plan considers all competing water uses.
The District is required to obtain legislative
authorization, which may be a general appropriation, prior to executing a project
cooperation agreement for any project or operational change resulting from the Restudy.
The Legislature will have the opportunity to approve, reject, or modify any proposed
project or operational change. If the Legislature takes no action regarding the project
modifications, the District may proceed with executing a project cooperation agreement,
provided the District can meet its financial responsibility without future legislative
appropriations.
Wastewater Treatment
HB
4475
This bill amends provisions of Chapters 381
and 489, F.S., relating to onsite sewage treatment and disposal systems and regulation of
persons installing or servicing septic tank systems. The bill provides the Department of
Health (DOH) with clarified rulemaking authority to create a program for continuing
education courses for persons installing or servicing septic tanks, including requirements
relating to content of such courses and standards for approval of course providers, as
well as criteria for accepting alternative continuing education proposals.
The bill revises the statutory variance
provisions from onsite sewage treatment and disposal system requirements to include cost
as a factor in establishing that no reasonable alternatives exist for the treatment of
sewage. The bill requires DOH to staff the existing variance review and advisory
committee, and requires the committee to make its recommendation on variance requests at
the meeting in which the application is scheduled for consideration, with certain
exceptions. The bill clarifies that the variance review and advisory committee must
include representatives recommended by the Florida Home Builders Association, the Florida
Septic Tank Association, the Florida Engineering Society, and the Florida Association of
Realtors.
The bill establishes specific requirements for
onsite sewage treatment and disposal systems located in floodways of the Suwannee and
Aucilla Rivers.
The bill requires DOH to staff the existing
technical review and advisory panel to assist DOH with rule adoption. The panel is also
authorized to review and comment on legislation or any existing or proposed state policy
or issue related to onsite sewage treatment and disposal systems. The bill requires that
the panel's position on proposed rules be made part of the rulemaking record maintained by
the DOH. The bill clarifies DOH's authority to establish rules prescribing the method for
approval of continuing education courses and for renewal of annual registrations for
master septic tank and septic tank contractors.
III. NATURAL RESOURCES
Ad Valorem Tax Assessment of Agricultural Lands
CS/HB
489
This bill clarifies that, when valuing
agricultural property for ad valorem tax purposes, the property appraiser may consider
factors which are reflective of the standard current practices in agricultural use and
production. Now codified is the recommendation of the Greenbelt advisory task force that
the property appraiser must utilize 5-year moving average data when calculating
agricultural assessments based on the income methodology approach.
DEP Rulemaking for Phosphogypsum
CS/SB
1176
This bill requires DEP to adopt rules
regulating the construction and operation of impoundment structures and water conveyance
piping systems used in phosphogypsum management. In Chapter 62-672, F.A.C., DEP currently
regulates some elements of this industry, but these rules do not address impoundment
structures or water conveyance piping systems in any detail. This legislation is the
direct result of a 54 million gallon spill from a phosphate facility in December, 1997.
Inland Waterway Management
CS/HB
3369
The Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND)
and the West Coast Inland Navigation District (WCIND) were created by the Legislature as
local sponsors of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Project. FIND is a multi-county
special district encompassing 11 east coast counties from Duval County south to Dade
County. WCIND encompasses the four counties of Manatee, Sarasota, Charlotte and Lee. CS/HB
3369 expands the authority of both FIND and WCIND in the following ways.
FIND and WCIND are authorized to execute
cooperative agreements with the Federal Government in addition to state, member counties,
and local governments within the district in order to alleviate problems associated with
their waterways. The scope of such cooperative agreements may include local and regional
anchorage management and beach nourishment projects in addition to public navigation,
public recreation, inlet management, environmental education, and boating safety projects
directly related to the waterways. FIND and WCIND may enter into cooperative agreements
with the United States Army Corps of Engineers to share in the costs of acquisition,
planning, development, construction, reconstruction, extension, improvement, operation and
maintenance of projects. Both districts may enter into ecosystem management agreements
with the DEP. The districts may now waive the requirement for matching funds on a project
from member counties and local governments for the enhancement of public navigation; law
enforcement on the waterways; environmental education projects within the district; and
during states of emergency. Finally, DEP may negotiate a memorandum of agreement with FIND
and WCIND to provide a supplemental process for the issuance of joint coastal permits or
environmental resource permits for regional waterway management activities. The sunset
review for WCIND is repealed.
Beach Management Funding
CS/HB
3427
CS/HB 3427 provides a dedicated funding source
for management, restoration and renourishment of Florida's beaches, and amends the
criteria to be used by DEP in determining annual funding priorities. The bill provides a
legislative declaration that beach restoration and renourishment projects are in the
public interest. The bill also provides for disbursements from the Ecosystem Management
and Restoration Trust Fund to implement regional components of the beach management plan
and to allow DEP to enter into agreements with other governmental entities to cost share
and coordinate such activities. Such disbursements are contingent upon legislative
appropriation. The bill directs that a portion of the documentary stamp tax revenues be
deposited in the Ecosystem Management and Restoration Trust Fund for beach restoration and
renourishment purposes. $10 million will be deposited into the Trust Fund in fiscal year
1998-99, $20 million will be deposited in fiscal year 1999-2000, and $30 million will be
deposited in each fiscal year thereafter.
Finally, the bill revises the criteria used to
determine funding priorities and provides financial incentives to local sponsors to
achieve savings through geographic coordination and sequencing. The also bill authorizes
DEP to sponsor demonstration projects of new or innovative technology for beach
renourishment.
Timber Management
CS/HB
3671
CS/HB 3671 is expected to result in the
increased use of state lands for timber management. Forestry interests have long
maintained that large parcels owned by the state could be timbered to generate revenue and
to manage the resources. All land management plans adopted pursuant to Chapter 253, F.S.,
for parcels larger than 1,000 acres are required to analyze the parcel's potential to
generate revenue through timber management, provided that such use is consistent with the
primary management objective for the parcel. The management agency developing the plan is
required to consult with a qualified professional forester to analyze the potential for
timber management. State agencies with management responsibilities are encouraged to
consult with the Division of Forestry for its assistance in developing the plans.
Conservation of Plants and Animals
CS/HB
3673
CS/HB 3673 provides for new recreational user
permit fees on lands leased by the Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission (GFWFC) and
corrects oversights to the 1996 aquaculture legislation. The bill clarifies jurisdiction
over aquaculture activities and provisions relating to aquaculture general permits,
providing for the streamlining of permit consolidation procedures. Harvesting or
possession of saltwater species for experimental, scientific, education, and/or exhibition
purposes is permissible, and a special activity license is authorized for the use of
special equipment for those purposes (e.g., trawls, seines, nets, etc.), and where
allowable, for innovative fisheries. The bill also provides for the delegation of
regulatory authority to water management districts for certain aquaculture facilities and
provides for a list of prioritized research needs for development of the aquaculture
industry. A portion of the fees assessed on the alligator egg collection permit and the
hide validation tag may be transferred to the General Inspection Trust Fund for providing
marketing and education services for alligator products produced in this state.
The bill also provides for importation or
possession of non-indigenous saltwater species through special activities licenses (SALs)
for production of marine aquaculture products in marine aquaculture facilities. It
requires specific management practices for these species, as well as anadromous sturgeon,
to prevent their release into Florida waters to protect indigenous populations of
saltwater species and aquaculture facilities. Additional protection is provided for
aquaculture products produced on submerged land leases by establishing a zone outside the
lease where harvesting is prohibited.
The bill requires the Aquaculture Review
Council to provide, by August 1 of each year, a list of prioritized research needs
critical to the development of the aquaculture industry to the Governor and Legislature.
Future rulemaking will likely occur as a result of the modified SAL provisions and the
delegation of oversight of certain aquaculture activities to water management districts.
Coastal Zone Protection
HB
3863
This bill redefines "substantial
improvement" pursuant to the Coastal Zone Protection Act. Under the revised
definition, certain types of interior finishings will not be counted in determining the
cost of an improvement or repair for purposes of determining whether the improvement or
repair is "substantial." The impact of this change should be that fewer
improvements and repairs will be deemed "substantial," thereby requiring fewer
structures to be brought into compliance with the coastal building code.
Certain nonstructural interior finishings are specifically excluded
from the definition of "substantial improvement," including finish flooring and
floor coverings, interior doors, freestanding metal fireplaces, tubs and shower
enclosures, lavatories, and water heaters.
Special Event Submerged Lands Leases
HB
4039
The Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust
Fund may now issue leases or consents of use for a period not to exceed 30 days for the
use of sovereign submerged lands for special events. Such leases or consents of use may
allow the installation of including docks, moorings, pilings and access walkways on
sovereign submerged lands solely for the purpose of facilitating boat shows and displays
in, or adjacent to, established marinas or government owned upland property.
Nonapplicant owners of adjacent riparian
uplands must be notified by certified mail of a request for such a lease or consent of use
before approval by the Trustees. If the nonapplicant owner objects to the issuance of such
a lease or consent of use, the Trustees must balance the interests of the objector with
the economic interests of the public and the state as a factor in determining whether or
not to approve the requested lease or consent of use.
Special event leases or consents of use may
not be issued for structures for viewing motorboat racing, high speed motorboat contests
or high speed displays in waters where manatees are known to frequent.
IV. LAND USE AND PROPERTY
Brownfield Redevelopment Incentives
CS/SB
1202
In 1997, the Legislature enacted the
Brownfields Redevelopment Act (Act) designed to promote redevelopment of abandoned,
under-utilized or idled industrial/commercial properties with actual or perceived
contamination problems. While DEP proceeded to develop rules governing brownfield
assessment and remediation activities, interested parties quickly recognized that the 1997
Legislation failed to offer sufficient economic incentives to attract meaningful interest
in brownfield redevelopment activities. In response, the 1998 Legislature enacted CS/SB
1202 which, in addition to correcting minor glitches in the 1997 law, creates additional
support mechanisms, economic and otherwise, to encourage brownfield redevelopment.
The Act adds closed military bases to the list
of areas not required to undergo public hearings for brownfield designations, which list
also includes community redevelopment areas, enterprise zones, empowerment zones and
designated brownfield pilot project areas. Additionally, where a brownfield designation
requires the creation of new jobs, the legislation clarifies that the jobs must be
"permanent," whether full-time or part-time. The bill also deletes the
requirement that local governments, at the time of designating a brownfield area, notify
DEP of the person responsible for brownfield rehabilitation for each site within the area.
This allows local governments to use the brownfield designation as a means of attracting
responsible persons into the area to redevelop the sites.
The 1997 Act permitted a "brownfield
redevelopment bonus" refund for qualified "target industry businesses"
which are established at a rehabilitated brownfield site. The 1998 legislation requires
the director of the Office of Tourism, Trade, and Economic Development (OTTED) to approve
requests to waive the wage level requirements for the target industry positions unless it
can be demonstrated that doing so is contrary to the public interest. The bill is intended
to assist in the promotion of brownfield redevelopment through the creation of the
Brownfield Areas Loan Guarantee Council. The Council's purpose is to review and approve or
deny opportunities for participation in partnership agreements with institutions
associated with the redevelopment of brownfields. The bill establishes minimum criteria to
be met by participating lenders, and authorizes the Council to adopt rules governing the
guarantees. This program is limited to 5 years in duration and subject to renewal by the
Legislature.
The Board of Regents is directed to establish
at the University of South Florida the Interdisciplinary Center for Brownfield
Rehabilitation Assistance. Among its responsibilities, the Center shall conduct research
to develop solutions for rehabilitating and restoring brownfield properties and shall
research risk-based corrective action solutions for brownfields.
The bill authorizes an exception to the
statutory limits on the frequency of local government comprehensive plan amendments where
the amendment is related to proposed redevelopment of a designated brownfield site. Local
governments with a designated U.S. Environmental Protection Agency brownfield pilot
project and with a population below 1 million may apply to OTTED for designation of an
enterprise zone encompassing the brownfield area. Applications must be submitted by
December 31, 1999.
Brownfield Property Revolving Loan Trust Fund
CS/SB
1204
CS/SB 1204 creates the Brownfield Property
Ownership Clearance Assistance Revolving Loan Trust Fund. The fund, administered by the
Governor's Office of Tourism, Trade, and Economic Development (OTTED), establishes a
mechanism to provide low-interest loans to be used to clear outstanding, unresolved
contractor liens, tax certificates, or other liens on designated brownfield sites. OTTED
may issue loans from the fund to local governments, community redevelopment agencies, or
persons responsible for brownfield site rehabilitation. Loans from the fund may not exceed
5 years in term, and a single site is not eligible for more than 25% of the total funds
available that year. The interest on the loans is capped by the legislation.
OTTED is authorized to adopt rules to
implement the Brownfield Property Ownership Clearance Assistance Revolving Loan Trust Fund
created by CS/SB 1204.
Coastal Construction
SB
1434
This bill provides authority to DEP for
current coastal regulations which (1) relate to coastal excavation and construction,
setback requirements, waivers or variances, exemptions, the removal of unauthorized
structures or refilling of unauthorized excavations, and violations and penalties; (2)
authorize the Department to establish exemptions for minor activities determined not to
have adverse impacts on the coastal system; and (3) relate to the establishment of coastal
construction control lines, activities seaward of the coastal construction control line,
exemptions, and property owner agreements.
Coastal Redevelopment
CS/SB
1458
In recognition of the importance of
redevelopment of coastal resort and tourist areas that are deteriorating and experiencing
economic distress, the Legislature created the Coastal Resort Area Redevelopment Pilot
Project (Project). The focus of the Project is to promote coastal redevelopment under the
guidance of DEP. The bill appropriates an additional $1 million to DEP for the study of
factors that control harmful algal blooms, including red tide. DEP is to administer the
Project in the coastal areas of Florida's Atlantic Coast between the St. Johns River
entrance and Ponce Inlet (i.e., the Daytona Beach-Jacksonville area). The authorization
for the Project expires on December 31, 2002.
The bill clarifies that coastal redevelopment
projects are entitled to economic and other incentives available to "community
development" projects. The Office of the Governor, DEP, and the Department of
Community Affairs are required to assist in expediting the issuance of permits for coastal
redevelopment projects. Similarly, activities within the Project area are exempt from
certain siting and design criteria contained in Section 161.053, F.S. Exceptions are
provided to both specific shore parallel coverage and impervious surface requirements for
redevelopment within the Project area.
Additional funds are appropriated to DEP for
the purposes of studying and undertaking efforts to control and mitigate the effects of
harmful algal blooms.
School Concurrency and Growth Management
CS/SB
2474
This bill establishes precise ground rules for
local governments that wish to adopt school concurrency systems. The bill is based on
recommendations of the Public Schools Construction Study Commission. The bill does not
make it easier or more difficult to impose school concurrency; rather, it puts in place a
more specific and detailed prescription of the components of a school concurrency system,
and the standards to be applied in determining whether such a system is in compliance with
state law. It strengthens coordination requirements between local governments and school
boards. The bill also establishes an optional sector-planning process for large-scale land
planning with the prospect of an exemption from DRI review as an incentive. Finally, the
bill creates two study commissions on significant growth management issues. Specific
highlights are outlined below.
A school concurrency must be established only
on a countywide basis, and public school capital facilities program adopted as the
foundation for school concurrency must meet the same financial feasibility standard which
applies to other capital improvement programs. The bill encourages local governments to
utilize a countywide school concurrency service area but allows less-than-countywide
service areas if local officials demonstrate that they have maximized utilization of
school capacity consistent with certain other criteria. If less-than-countywide service
areas are utilized, they must be specified in the local comprehensive plan to ensure the
public schools capital facilities program is financially feasible. School concurrency may
only be imposed with uniform level of service standards that apply countywide to all
schools of the same type, such as elementary, middle and high schools.
The bill enacts a 3-year availability standard
for school concurrency, although local governments retain the option to set a more lenient
availability standard.
The current requirement that a county, school
board, and all municipalities in the county sign an interlocal agreement as a prerequisite
for school concurrency is continued, although it is relaxed somewhat by exempting
municipalities with a de minimis impact on school occupancy. Specific contents of
the interlocal agreement are established in the bill. The school concurrency provisions
are scheduled to take effect July 1, 1998, the expiration date for a legislatively enacted
suspension of local government authority to impose school concurrency in all counties
except Broward. With regard to Broward County, it must implement its school concurrency
system based on pre-existing general law; the Final Order adopted by the Governor and
Cabinet in March, 1998, finding Broward's system not in compliance with state law; and the
outcome of a pending appeal.
The legislation fine tunes Chapters 163 and
235, F.S., to promote closer coordination of land planning by local governments and school
planning by school boards, with new requirements for local governments to identify land
use districts in which schools are permissible, and criteria to promote locating schools
in residential areas.
The bill extends the interval between
evaluation and appraisal reports (EARs) from 5 to 7 years and changes the enforcement
mechanism so a local government would have until 1 year after the due date for its EAR to
be found sufficient before restrictions on plan amendments would go into effect. The
existing exemption for DRI-related plan amendments from this enforcement mechanism is
retained. All existing statutory applications of the State Land Development Plan (SLDP)
are eliminated, including the one making consistency with this plan a requirement for DRI
approval. The bill provides that the SLDP shall have no legal effect unless the
Legislature by general law either enacts the SLDP as a statute or grants DCA express
rulemaking authority to adopt the SLDP by rule for a specific application.
The bill makes it permissive for the Executive
Office of the Governor to adopt a rule establishing minimum criteria for plans adopted by
regional planning councils but retains a requirement for the Governor's staff to review
draft plans. The current State Comprehensive Plan (SCP) is officially designated as the
state planning document required by a 1992 constitutional amendment. The bill directs the
Governor to set up a special committee to study the current SCP so the new Governor can
recommend any changes by October 1, 1999. This committee also will consider whether the
SLDP should be retained and, if so, what application it should have.
Up to 5 pilot projects are authorized for a
2-step sector planning process for development of 5,000 acres or more. A local government
would adopt a long-term buildout overlay as part of its comprehensive plan and also adopt
smaller, more detailed sector plans for areas of at least 1,000 acres. Both acreage
thresholds could be waived. Both plans would be based upon the uniform standards used in
DRI reviews. When a sector plan is found in compliance, development would be exempt from
DRI review.
The bill sets up the Transportation and
Land Use Study Committee to study land use and transportation issues, including community
design, concurrency on the highway system, level of service methodologies, and land use
assessments used to project transportation needs. The committee's finding and
recommendations are due to the Legislature by January 15, 1999.
And finally, the bill expands the authority of
the Governor's Office of Tourism, Trade and Economic Development to award grant funds to
military base re-use activities, but it requires more matching funds from local
governments for such grants. The bill also changes some timelines for the military base
re-use planning process.
Land Platting
CS/HB
3223
The state now has uniform standards and
procedures for surveying and mapping lands which will be subject to a recorded plat. Such
standards relate to the type and placement of reference monuments--permanent control
points permanent reference monuments, etc.--to be used by surveyors in preparing the
subdivision plat. Other standards relate to the information--legends, "northing"
arrows, etc.--which must appear on the face of the subdivision plat.
The bill requires subdivision plats to be
prepared by a professional surveyor and mapper. The plat must include a boundary survey of
the property being subdivided. Also, the plat must be reviewed for conformity with the
requirements of Chapter 177, F.S., by a professional surveyor and mapper employed by the
local government. The cost of that review is borne by the entity offering the plat for
recordation. Recorded plats must show the location and width of proposed and existing
easements identified in the title opinion for the property. The approval of a
"replat" which encompasses lands embraced by a prior recorded plat shall
automatically and simultaneously vacate the prior plat.
Enterprise Zones
HB
3225
HB 3225 expands the list of companies eligible
to take advantage of enterprise zone tax benefits. Counties are authorized to alter
enterprise zone boundaries. The bill also authorizes Enterprise Florida to administer $1.2
million for grants-in-aid to the Technological Research and Development Authority.
The bill provides that an enterprise zone
business in a community impacted by fishing net limitations is eligible for the maximum
sales tax and corporate income tax credits available, provided that 20% or more of its
employees are residents of the county within which the enterprise zone is located. The
bill exempts certain commercial fishing vessels, fishing guide boats and ecotourism guide
boats from Florida's sales tax if certain requirements are met.
Greenways
CS/HB
3771
It is now possible for landowners to contract
with the state to designate private property as part of the Greenways and Trails System
administered by DEP. As a participation incentive, the bill provides limitations on
landowner liability among other landowner benefits. Private property designations could be
beneficial in meeting open space and recreation requirements for land development
projects, especially new communities.
Most significant are the liability protections
afforded by the legislation. Owners who designate land as part of the Greenways system
owes no duty of care to those who enter the greenway. They are further relieved of a duty
to warn of hazardous conditions. Similarly, owners who designate land for the Greenways
system are relieved of liability for injuries to persons caused by an Act or omission of a
person who enters the land. The limitations on liability also apply to owners adjacent
lands that are accessed from a designated greenway.
The DEP must erect signs on the perimeter of a
greenway designated on privately-owned land informing greenway users that adjacent lands
are private property. DEP is authorized to indemnify a private landowner against damage
claims by third parties as part of an agreement to designate a greenway on private lands.
Planning materials, maps, surveys and other
information used in the Greenways program to identify prospective greenways shall not
constitute a designation. Identification of lands in such materials shall not have any
regulatory effect. Designation of a greenway on private land shall only be by contract
with the landowner. DEP is authorized to negotiate greenway designation agreements which
include retention of certain rights by landowners, moving parcels higher on the state land
acquisition priority list and other benefits.
Other aspects of the bill include the naming
of the Cross-Florida Greenways State Recreation and Conservation Area in honor of the late
Marjorie Carr, a Gainesville environmentalist. Also, the Board of Trustees of the Internal
Improvement Trust Fund is directed to sell certain lands in Walton County, acquired as
part of a major state land acquisition in 1993, to Walton County for creation of a new
town based on plans prepared by the state-funded South Walton Conservation and Development
Trust.
DEP is authorized to promulgate rules to
implement the statutes creating the basis for greenway designation agreements between DEP
and private landowners.
DOT Mitigation/Lake Belt Mitigation/Eminent Domain
CS/HB
4071
CS/HB 4071 combines several separate issues
raised during the 1998 Session. DOT will continue to be a beneficiary of a $75,000 per
acre impact mitigation plan implemented by water management districts and DEP. DEP
benefits by having the period of time for its repayment of a $12 million advance from the
DOT extended for 4 years. Mitigation bankers must be consulted prior to the development of
DOT's mitigation plan. A preliminary plan must be submitted by December 1, 1998. Submittal
of this preliminary plan must include an explanation of why mitigation banks were (or were
not) chosen as a possible option of mitigating the DOT construction impacts. A water
management district's preliminary approval of a DOT mitigation plan is not subject to an
administrative challenge.
Limerock miners in Dade County will benefit by
implementation of the Lake Belt Mitigation Plan which authorizes excavation of limerock in
an area of the East Everglades in exchange for the payment of a mitigation fee at the rate
of $0.05 per ton. That fee will become effective on October 1, 1998. The monies generated
by the fee will be transferred to the District and deposited into the Lake Belt Mitigation
Trust Fund created by another bill (CS/HB 1667). The District is directed to use the
mitigation monies to purchase, restore or manage wetlands and uplands, or to purchase
mitigation credits from mitigation banks, to offset the loss of the value and functions of
the wetlands impacted by the mining. The expenditure of monies pursuant to the mitigation
plan shall be reviewed by an inter-agency committee. The bill provides that the payment of
the mitigation fees will satisfy all local, state, and regional mitigation criteria, and
it further expresses the intent that federal mitigation requirements are also met. A
formula is provided for the increase in the limerock mitigation fee beginning on January
1, 2000. Annual reports are required to be submitted evaluating the costs and revenues
generated by the fee. Landowners within the Kissimmee River restoration area may become
involved in condemnation proceedings based on authority granted to the South Florida Water
Management District (SFWMD).
All landowners within the SFWMD may benefit
from a provision that will prevent the SFWMD from using federal condemnation proceedings
to acquire property. This provision was extremely controversial with environmental groups.
To promote and encourage the SFWMD's
acquisition of lands in and around the Kissimmee River and the C-111 Canal, those projects
are legislatively determined to be in the public interest. Specific authority is granted
to the SFWMD to exercise its eminent domain authority to acquire specified property. To
prevent the SFWMD from using federal eminent domain law to reduce the acquisition price
for lands within the SFWMD, the bill provides that through July 1, 2000, monies may only
be disbursed to the federal government for acquisition if the value paid is commensurate
with that which would have been paid using Florida eminent domain law. This provision
resulted from a number of complaints that landowners were being denied recovery of
attorneys' fees and other guarantees under Florida law by use of the federal condemnation
procedures.
In 1994, prior to the state's acceptance of
the NPDES delegation, the Legislature allowed DEP to borrow $3.2 million from the
Pollution Recovery Trust Fund to start this permitting program. DEP was obligated to repay
this loan by July 1, 2000. CS/HB 4071 relieves DEP of that obligation.
The bill furthers the recognition of global
positioning survey systems and the surveys resulting from the use of this technology. The
bill states that wetland locations approved or conducted by DEP or water management
districts that are certified by an engineer or a surveyor must be accepted as a formal
jurisdictional determination and can serve as the basis for a permit under Chapter 373,
F.S. Although global positioning systems are not specifically referenced, it was agreed
that the location of wetlands can be determined by use of this technology so long as an
engineer or a surveyor certifies the accuracy of that delineation and the SFWMD or DEP
approves.
Frank Matthews is a Shareholder with Hopping Green Sams &
Smith, P.A. in Tallahassee, Florida, and has lobbied extensively over the last 14 years on
environmental issues. He represented development, agricultural, utility, municipal and
mining interests on brownfields, wetlands, water, property rights and land acquisition
legislation this past session.
Gary K. Hunter, Jr. is a Shareholder with Hopping Green Sams &
Smith, P.A. in Tallahassee, Florida. His practice focuses on environmental litigation and
solid and hazardous waste regulation. Mr. Hunter received his J.D., cum laude, from the
University of Georgia where he also received his B.B.A.
Robert Manning is an Associate with Hopping Green Sams &
Smith, P.A. in Tallahassee, Florida, and is the Chair of the Legislative Committee of the
ELULS. He received his B.A. from the University of Florida and his J.D., with High Honors,
from the University of Tennessee. Mr. Manning practices primarily in the areas of air and
water quality regulation and permitting.
Special thanks go to many other individuals at Hopping Green Sams &
Smith, P.A. for their contributions to this legislative summary.