|
|
CHARLOTTE COUNTY v. SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
Div of Admin Hearings STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS Petitioners, vs. SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, Respondent, and FLORIDA CITRUS MUTUAL and MANATEE COUNTY, Intervenors. CASE NO. 94-5742RP A formal administrative hearing was conducted in these consolidated cases on February 27 - March 3, March 6-8, May 1-5, May 24-26, May 29 - June 2, June 5-9, July 6 and 7, July 10 and11, July 17-21, July 24-27, September 11-14, September 18-22, September 25-29, October 10-12, October 16-20, October 30 - November 2, and November 13-17, 1995, in Tampa, Florida, before J. Stephen Menton, an Administrative Law Judge1 of the Division of Administrative Hearings.
For Petitioner Charlotte County, Florida ("Charlotte"):
Chris H. Bentley, Esquire Renee Francis Lee, Esquire Douglas M. Wyckoff, Esquire For Petitioner Pinellas County, Florida ("Pinellas"): Edward de le Parte, Esquire For Petitioners DeSoto County and Hardee County, Florida ("DeSoto" and "Hardee"): Daniel P. Fernandez, Esquire Kent A. Zaiser, Esquire Gary A. Vorbeck, Esquire For Petitioner Polk County, Florida ("Polk"): Mark F. Carpanini, Esquire For Petitioners G B S Groves, Inc. and Citrus Grower Associates, Inc. ("G B S" and "Citrus Grower"): J.T. Griffiths, President For Petitioner Environmental Confederation of Southwest Florida, Inc. ("ECOSWF"): David G. Guest, Esquire For Respondent Southwest Florida Water Management District ("District"): James A. Robinson, Esquire John Wilcox, Esquire Stanley J. Niego, Esquire For Intervenor Florida Citrus Mutual ("Florida Citrus"): Joseph J. Gleason, Esquire For Intervenor Manatee County, Florida ("Manatee"): H. Hamilton Rice, Jr., Esquire
The primary issue in these consolidated cases is whether the proposed Southern Water Use Caution Area ("SWUCA") rules of the Southwest Florida Water Management District (the "District") constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority. Also at issue in the proceedings is the validity of certain portions of the District's existing water use permitting rules contained in Chapter 40D-2, Florida Administrative Code ("F.A.C."), and the "Basis of Review for Water Use Permit Applications" that the District has adopted by reference in Rule 40D-2.091, F.A.C. Finally, certain policies allegedly utilized by the District in its water use permitting program have been challenged as unpromulgated rules in contravention of Section 120.535, Florida Statutes (1993) ("F.S.").
|